paul roger moore colusa ca
But it is the jury's prerogative, not ours, to weigh the evidence. As soon as that door starts to open, that washer is free. In fact, after Roberto injured his shoulder, Paul accompanied him on occasion to the irrigation pumps to adjust water levels. Here the prosecution sought to prove that Paul disliked Roberto Ayala, believed he was a liability to the farm, and thought that his removal would allow Paul to assume greater managerial responsibilities. One of Pauls complaints was that Peter got an air-conditioned cab, while he drove the tractor, simply because he was unbearable to work with, otherwise. Paul Wynn Jan. 12, 2023. We are not at liberty to second-guess the trial court's careful and reasoned assessment, and because we find there is no abuse of discretion, there was no error in admitting the evidence. He thought he was safe in the States. In his trial, he received a guilty verdict and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The bomb also contained a plastic container filled with gasoline to ignite during the explosion and enhance the thermal effect. Paul's son Gunner testified that when Paul was young, he rewired the light switch in his bedroom so he could turn off the light from his bed, but if a person did not flip the switch in a particular way, he or she would be shocked. Eduardo Ayala testified that he knew Peter characterized him and his coworkers as a lazy group of drug addicts and alcoholics who would ruin the Moore brothers' agricultural business. Whoever drew the diagram, he believed, was intimately familiar with the construction of that device.. David Moore's birthday is 01/17/1944 and is 78 years old. Colusa Sun-Herald Obituaries - Legacy.com The governing District was organized on July 16, 1923. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. Performance & security by Cloudflare. Do I think Peter (Paul's cousin) did this? Beyond the substance of the arguments, Paul contends the prosecutors sandbagged him by withholding the most powerful evidence until rebuttal and depriving him of the opportunity to answer that evidence. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. Roberto Ayala had worked for the Moore brothers for 19 years, and brothers Paul and Peter Moore reportedly shared animosity toward Ayala. November: By November the investigation had targeted Paul. Paul's voice was powerful circumstantial evidence the prosecution had every right to exploit. What is Roger Moore's Net Worth? He claimed Roberto was a good person but admitted he became upset when he saw Roberto drinking and driving on the farm. The lack of complete alignment resulted from the diagram or indented sheet being moved, the diagram being drawn at different times, or a line being overwritten. Sorry, there are no recent results for popular images. Based on Peter's violent disposition and the threats he leveled at Roberto, among others, the rat trap YouTube video found on his computer, his basic understanding of electrical devices sufficient to enable him to install electric sprinkler systems, his familiarity with the field and with Roberto's responsibilities, his opportunity to plant the bomb, and his compelling motive to remove him from the farm, Paul argued that Peter planted the bomb that Roberto activated when he opened the electrical box to adjust the water levels on the rice field. He also noted that the second letter, bomb diagram, and indented sheet of paper had comparable levels of sodium, sulfur, and chlorine. On July 16, 2011, he was killed in front of his son. Paul insists it was his first cousin Peter who had the motive and violent disposition to murder Roberto, a man who had claimed his father's and uncle's affection and devotion. Elena Paul & Kurt Richter Jv * Colusa, CA 95932: $1,211,092 * USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. I finally found the Ford, and now it is driven by some young guy, not the brother. Ultimately, the Ayala family was awarded $20 million. Paul argues the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence he had wiretapped his ex-wife's telephone during divorce proceedings 15 years earlier and had made oxygen acetylene bombs 20 years earlier. Whether a trial court has erred in admitting evidence under Evidence Code section 1101 is also reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Paul Moore convicted in Colusa bombing death - Appeal-Democrat But apparently they had little difficulty reaching their verdict. But Peter's situation was far different. Becoming windy late. Expert in Vietnam devices. Higher wind gusts possible.. Winds S at 20 to 30 mph. He contends the evidence was too remote, was not probative of his knowledge of electrical circuitry or constructing sophisticated bombs, and was substantially more prejudicial than probative. Of Paul Moore, Poyner said, "the guy is evil. That evidence, Paul argued, pointed to Peter's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We cannot say the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of a pattern of fascination and aptitude with building things, some requiring electrical aptitude and some that did not. He had been angry and upset with the Moore family since he was 12 years old. Neither cousin was happy with his place within the family hierarchy. This vehicle info is the same as the first job. "We've waited 25 months and seven days for this moment," said Eduardo Ayala, brother of the victim. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. (Evid. In her opinion, the labels came from the same tape cassette or from another one with the same characteristics. He lived with his parents and. Gus stood ready to arrest him for trespassing if he was found on the premises. Roger Hickel Obituary (1935-2011) - Colusa, CA - Colusa Sun-Herald It is true that the prosecution did not elicit testimony from the ex-father-in-law or from anyone else about what electrical knowledge was necessary to wiretap a telephone. Ayala worked at the Moore Brothers Farm, where he was trusted by brothers Arlan and Roger. Without going as far as the prosecutor in overstating the probative value, therefore, we do conclude the risk of prejudice was so conspicuously slight that it did not substantially outweigh the probative value the explosion-making incident had in establishing that Paul did have some familiarity, even if rudimentary, with working with explosives. People v. Moore | Law.com He was able, however, to install electrical sprinkler systems. Chance of rain 100%. Half of the amount will go to. But the degree of sophistication it takes to wiretap is not dispositive. The investigators did not believe that a Mexican gang was involved in the explosion because gangs typically advertise their involvement rather than hide it, to incite fear and command respect. Considering the ability to spring the money for such luxuries, Roger is definitely quite loaded. Search by Name, Phone, Address, or Email. His son, Fabian, who was 7 at the time, witnessed the explosion and ran two miles through fields to find help. District Attorney John Poyner said Parisi was the best defense attorney he has ever gone up against. Paul objects to the prosecutor's use of a DNA analogy. But the document provided strong circumstantial evidence he secretly envied the position to which Roberto had ascended and the discomfort Roberto's presence continued to cause him. He ran to help him, but his father was unresponsive. Whatever they uncovered at his house, tied him to the evidence collected from the crime scene. He needs to be careful. From this evidence, the jury could reasonably infer that because Paul was familiar with Roberto's routine, he could specifically target Roberto by placing the bomb in an electrical pump panel he knew Roberto would be operating. hkruger@appealdemocrat.com. Fill out this form to submit a Letter to the Editor. Paul Moore was convicted in August 2013 of first-degree murder with special circumstances. [] [], The bale strikes the nail, and the nail strikes the primer, and this is all happening immediately. He threatened to beat [his] dad's ass on multiple occasions. A document examiner from the United States Secret Service compared the ink from the documents sent to the sheriff's department with the ink on documents from the printer confiscated at Paul's house. He pointed out that the markings or threading on the metal indicated to him the explosion was not an accident. Paul was well represented at trial, and his lawyer effectively lodged these arguments, and many more, to the jurors. On August 18 Paul brought in another fragment he thought was suspicious and indicative of a bomb going off. Eduardo Ayala told an investigator he saw Paul manufacturing spikes in the farm maintenance shop. "My sister-in-law is friends with the family," he said. Bomb victim's family awarded $20M | Colusa Sun Herald - Appeal-Democrat The investigators placed a GPS (global positioning system) device on his truck, devices that often malfunction. Offer condolences/tributes, send flowers or create an online memorial for free. The next day, the investigators at the Colusa County Sheriff's Department received a letter with a postmark from Sacramento that they learned was processed by the postal service in West Sacramento. To understand if, why, and how Paul would have blown up Roberto, the prosecution attempted to tell the painful story of the men of the Moore family farm and their tortured relationships. Gunner also reported that, according to his dad soon after the explosion, his grandfather feared that there was a booby trap in the switch and stated that someone must have been a genius to be able to do that, some type of electrical genius.. A bomb-sniffing dog did not alert on anything explosive in the house, garage, or truck. We find no merit in Paul's objection to the admissibility of his own life story. But the fire and law enforcement officials who performed the initial investigation did not know a bomb had been planted in the irrigation pump. COLUSA COUNTY (CBS13) - A man has been convicted of murdering a farmworker by setting a bomb in an electrical panel that was triggered by the victim at irrigation pump. Higher wind gusts possible. You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. Paul formulates two attacks arising from the prosecutor's final argument in rebuttal. How Was Roberto Ayala Murdered? - The Cinemaholic The evidence is all circumstantial. Paul Roger Moore, 49, is facing life - The Sacramento Bee | Facebook Moore Farms / White Wolf Potato Co. | Moore Farms opened the power panel for a water pump on a rice field south of Colusa on July 16, 2011. Our sole duty, as we wrote at the outset, is only to insure that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict this jury reached. On October 3 investigators also found spikes down a private farm road. Paul Moore, Roberto Ayala's Killer, Was Sentenced to Life in Prison Please try again. Considered in context, there is no danger the jurors were misled or that the document examiner's expert testimony was falsely elevated to the stature of DNA evidence. The court summarized what it perceived was a two-part argument: first, that Paul had no part in the killing and had no motive to kill Roberto because everything was rosy for him at the farm and he had worked his way into a happy partnership with his father; but second, his cousin Peter, who was bitter and estranged from the farm he loved, was a plausible bomb builder because he was capable of constructing the simple explosive device in question, particularly with the assistance of the YouTube video found on his computer. According to Consuelo Conedy-Ruiz, the wife of one of the farm workers, Peter intentionally ran over her dog and drove away. The trial court sustained the defense objection to the prosecution's characterizations, thereby limiting the prejudicial effect of the alleged prosecutorial error. Our criminal justice system is predicated on the fundamental notion that a person accused of criminal conduct must be convicted based on evidence that he or she committed the alleged conduct and not merely based on evidence of a criminal disposition or a criminal reputation. According to Peter, the Ayala brothers agitated Paul and he remarked, Those son-of-a-bitches, they are trying to take over my life. Roger, Pauls father, got tied up in a civil suit brought by Ayalas wife, where she alleged that he must have been aware or should have been aware of Pauls malice and past criminal activities. NICHOLSON, J. Winds S at 20 to 30 mph. They seized this sheet but not the sheets of paper below it. There is no direct evidence that Peter knew Roberto's precise work schedule or routine, but a jury could reasonably infer that he understood that a foreman's responsibility included adjusting the water levels on the rice fields. They gave me two months 4 this job. But Paul insists the prosecutor's rebuttal constituted error, even if we assume it was not intentional. I will come peacefully or detonate all the devices.. Colusa Cemetery District, Colusa, CA - Burial Records - Interment.net The delivery and return addresses were printed label strips made with a label maker. The perforating shrapnel- or fragment-related injuries occurred immediately before the fire-related injuries. (People v. Hendrix (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 216, 238.) On top of that, Roger surely had the resources to ensure everyone was looked after. To the contrary, the prosecutor did nothing more than marshal validly admitted evidence to counter defense argument: that is, the prosecutor referred to wiretapping evidence to demonstrate that Paul had superior technical skills to Peter and to his My Life entries to demonstrate he had a motive to kill Roberto, based on a lifetime of indignities and slights he felt on the farm. However, we have been able to discern that he is currently at Colusa, and is a pillar of the community. THE PEOPLE v. PAUL ROGER MOORE (2016) | FindLaw Im going to get that F*****.. The jury was properly reminded to consider the evidence solely for its tendency to prove Paul's knowledge of electrical and technical devices. It's leveraged in between there. Arlan Moore Obituary (2015) - Colusa, CA - Appeal Democrat - Legacy.com But that is not to say a wiretap does not have sufficient probative value to merit admission, and given the minimal risk of potential prejudice, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence that did offer some probative value into the extent of Paul's knowledge about building and connecting electrical and mechanical devices. A bomb exploded in a rice field, as Ayala was adjusting the irrigation pump. And that primer is causing an immediate flash into the cavity of that pipe assembly, the pipe bomb itself, and initiates the explosive charge. At trial he explained he had difficulty understanding the documents he was asked to review, but that he could understand an oral description of their contents. The prosecution argued that Paul was attempting to taunt the police. In his view, the admission of such prejudicial evidence rendered the state proceedings fundamentally unfair and violated his right to a fair trial under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The trial court cannot be said to have abused its discretion by admitting highly relevant evidence when the only prejudice is the fact the story Paul himself told was a damaging one. Roberto's seven-year-old son told the investigators and testified at the preliminary hearing that he did not move or drive the truck after the bomb exploded. On August 15 the investigators received a second letter and a diagram of a bomb. His reputation in the community would make Peter the more likely suspect than Paul. As a child he rigged his light switch; as a father he taught his son how to hardwire his car; as a farmer he designed a mud chisel, rice rollers, and a fertilizer aqua bar. And while it may be doubtful that Paul killed the farm's foreman to accelerate his own position given that his father had already decided to partner with him, he certainly felt aggrieved and humiliated that he had been denied the opportunity to become the foreman when he graduated from high school and that, throughout his life, those employees like Roberto Ayala who were not part of the Moore family were valued more and treated better than either Peter or Paul. Because the My Life document was highly probative, it is not surprising or improper that the prosecutor quoted it in the opening of his rebuttal argument. First, he complains the prosecutors sandbagged him by engaging one prosecutor, who played a more minor role at trial, to make a perfunctory opening argument, saving its genuine substantive attack by the prosecutor who conducted the bulk of the examination. We will review that evidence in two steps: first, we will outline the evidence of solid, credible value the jury could have reasonably relied upon in finding Paul guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution called a litany of forensic experts connecting Paul to the sheet of paper with the indentations of the bomb diagram, the paper in the printer to the paper used in the diagram of the bomb, the ink in the copier to the ink used on the second letter and the diagram, the type of labels used in the letters and diagram to the type Paul used on his own files, and the fishing line found in his boat to the type of fishing line used in the bomb.