cons of the national popular vote plan

It is not even a liberal or conservative bill. Popular vote better than Electoral College, Stanford scholars say But for those people who feel that changing how we elect the president should only be done by constitutional amendment they will feel that using the NPV Compact will undermine the legitimacy of the process even though its perfectly legal and constitutional. The time to stop its momentum is now. After all, is said and done, the candidate who attains the largest number of votes can still lose. The winner would receive all of the compact states electoral votes, giving them at least the necessary 270 to win the White House. In 2004, for example, candidates George W. Bush and John Kerry campaigned heavily in states such as Nevada while ignoring political issues in New York, a state that Kerry was sure to win, according to the University of the Pacific. In a direct popular election, a candidate could theoretically win without having broad support throughout the country. I am confident that when we enter the next phase where the popular vote leans Republican that Republicans will change and be adamant that we should elect the president by direct popular vote and Democrats will be arguing why we should keep the Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system. People are moving to live in like-minded communities more than ever before. F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush were elected with less than a majority of the votes cast. By adding this new interstate compact to the Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system to elect our president we are in fact making this system even more complicated and even harder for the voters to understand. Even though pre-election polls made conspicuous predictions of Hilary Clinton winning the presidency and . Yes. sale of united methodist church property. If that was to take place, America could potentially face the same issues it is facing now. Many people may feel that any major change in how we elect the president should be in the Constitution and not in a legal loop hole even if its legal and technically constitutional. But the much greater danger to American democracy is that direct elections may make it possible for a president to be elected by no more than 30 percent of the vote, regardless of his or her suitability for office, so long as there is sufficient money and a clever media advisor behind the effort. In summary, a popular vote is simply a vote in which the individual or issue with the most total votes from a population of voters is the winner. National Popular Vote - Pros and Cons : r/NeutralPolitics - reddit The National Popular Vote plan would eliminate what critics of the Electoral College system point to as the "winner-take-all" rule - the awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in that state. A Critique of the National Popular Vote October 13, 2008 Policy Analysis No. That created a voter value of 2.85. It happened once, in 1876. After all, the Electoral College makes it possible that a candidate who wins the majority of the votes could still lose the election. The NPV Interstate Compact does not eliminate the very complicated Electoral College system that most voters dont really understand. 1. Under the electoral college system of voting, the number of representatives a state has in Congress (Senators and Representatives) is the total number of electoral votes it is allowed. Here are the essential pros and cons of popular vote elections to examine. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. It would eliminate the Congressional provisions for a non-majority election. The National Bonus Plan was proposed by historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. 1. All samples were added by students. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among states and the District of Columbia to award their respective electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote of the presidential election. 5. At that stage, anyone who received an electoral vote is eligible to become the next president. A popular vote structure would virtually eliminate the idea of a third-party candidate having a chance in an election. Here are six reasons why legislators should reject this attempt to jettison our electoral system: 1. The Electoral College: An Overview and Analysis of Reform Proposals During a popular vote, a candidate who withdraws from the race or dies before the election can be held could still be on the ballot. Proponents of the National Popular Vote fail to understand the most basic facts about the American presidential electoral system. 13 Early College High School Pros and Cons, 18 Major Advantages and Disadvantages of the Payback Period, 20 Advantages and Disadvantages of Leasing a Car, 19 Advantages and Disadvantages of Debt Financing, 24 Key Advantages and Disadvantages of a C Corporation, 16 Biggest Advantages and Disadvantages of Mediation, 18 Advantages and Disadvantages of a Gated Community, 17 Big Advantages and Disadvantages of Focus Groups, 17 Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Corporate Bonds, 19 Major Advantages and Disadvantages of Annuities, 17 Biggest Advantages and Disadvantages of Advertising. If you need to flag this entry as abusive. That would give the Compact states only 3 days( and two of those days were weekend days) to certify their state votes. The selection of presidential electors is specifically entrusted to the states by the Constitution. In the 2016 election, only 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls. Instead, it modifies the winner-take-all rule in a way its supporters say would assure that every vote will matter in every state in every presidential election. Today, many electors are bound to vote according to their states' popular vote results, and those who aren't almost always do. Now, the states are considering the National Popular Vote plan, a system that, while not doing away with the Electoral College system, would modify it to ensure that the candidate winning the national popular vote is ultimately elected president. Candidates feel they either cant win or lose with the votes from these states. But sometime in the future the popular vote will change back and lean Republican. Since the Constitution and the Bill of Rights became governing documents in the United States, there have only been 17 amendments made to it. However that presumably rare exception happened in the 2000 election when Florida could not complete their statewide recount in time for the Electoral College deadline and the Supreme Court forced Florida to use their first vote count without a statewide recount. Americans are still bent up and flustered on how an individual could lose the popular vote, but still, be given the upper hand in Electoral College votes. Of the 538 Electoral College votes available, Donald J. Trump received 304 votes, Hillary Clinton received 227 votes, and seven votes went to others: three for Colin Powell, one for Faith Spotted Eagle, one for John Kasich, one for Ron Paul, and one for Bernie Sanders). Because its so hard to get an amendment to the Constitution passed that means that once it becomes law it will probably remain so for a long time because the bar to change it back is so high. 3. The Pros and Cons of the Electoral College - SmartAsset The electoral college is a tradition of American politics that's fairly controversial. Past Event - LWV Webinar on Popular Vote - The Buchanan Chronicle Under the plan, Michigan's 15 Electoral . By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. Six Reasons to Reject National Popular Vote - Pelican Policy cons of the national popular vote planchicago religious demographics. It has been enacted into law in 11 states with 165 electoral votes, and will take effect when enacted by states with 105 more. The Congressional District method would allocate electoral votes based on the winner of each congressional district. If a popular vote were allowed to declare a winner instead, it wouldnt be through a state-by-state counting of electoral votes. Cons: Smaller states don't get as much of a say and people would demand a national recount National Bonus Plan Winner of popular vote gets extra 102 electoral votes Pros: No winner of popular vote losing overall Cons: Basically exactly like the Direct plan District Plan Win popular vote in each district, you get one electoral vote. While we look further into the National Popular Vote, lets investigate some of its pro and cons for the American democracy. The states' approval of the compact is a victory for democracy and the principle of "one person, one vote." The United States does not have direct election of its president, yet most national, state and local offices are filled by the candidate with the most votes. These are the states that may go to either major party candidate in the election. If the presidential election were switched to the popular vote, then it would only take about 35% of the vote for a candidate to win. That could lead to a very bad situation where, instead of the people voting in November to determine who the next president is, one or two states could effectively decide who becomes the next president simply by joining or withdrawing from the NPV Compact and changing the rules on how the votes for president are counted in the next election. 1. cons of the national popular vote plansuper lemon haze greenhouse. June 7, 2022 . HuffPost's top politics stories, straight to your inbox. Though the original, some would say highly undemocratic, purpose. An electoral college would solve . Constitutional Amendment to Guarantee the Right to Vote for All U.S. Citizens. In contrast, other issues related to the federal government are not exclusively entrusted to the states, and therefore the states lack the power to alter them. The National Popular Vote compact would have the same effect as a constitutional amendment to abolish the Electoral College but has the benefit of retaining the power to control presidential elections in states hands. At the moment, 98 more electoral votes are needed to pass this bill in all 50 states (National Conference of State Legislators). Learn more about how the National Popular Vote compact works and the ways it could make our elections better for everyone. Louisiana voters should decide who receives Louisiana's electoral votes. . The first advantage allows for electoral votes to be fairer than the Electoral College (Richards). The Pros and Cons of the Electoral College - SmartAsset Voters in spectator states, including five of the nations 10 most populous states (California, Texas, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey), and 12 of the 13 least populous states (all but New Hampshire) have no real incentive to go to the polls as their votes do not affect the outcome of the election. National Popular Vote proponents argue that the United States has had four presidential elections in which the plurality winner of the popular vote was not chosen as president. To become president of the United States of America, you must be at least 35 years old, have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years and be a natural-born citizen. Pros and cons of district elections | Columnists | smdailyjournal.com A popular vote election would bring the presidential election in line with the rest of the election structures. Longley, Robert. This feature is critical to the passionate bipartisan support the compact receives. tobin james the blend 2017 ; real estate marketing solutions; cons of the national popular vote plan; lassi kefalonia shops cons of the national popular vote plan And thats not how it should be in a democracy. The last amendment, the 27th Amendment to the Constitution, was ratified nearly 200 years after it was originally proposed. The second advantage is that the all votes would be equally weighed (Richards). National popular vote - Ballotpedia The Electoral College is made up of 538 electors and a majority of 270 electoral votes is mandatory to nominate the President. You can find out more about our use, change your default settings, and withdraw your consent at any time with effect for the future by visiting Cookies Settings, which can also be found in the footer of the site. Donald Trump won the presidential election by securing 304 electoral votes, compared to Hillary Clintons 227 electoral votes. Steve Sisolak vetoed it. According to Article II, Section 1, "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress." The National Popular Vote Bill is a bill for Americans interested in both preserving our Electoral College and reforming the shortcomings of our current "winner-take-all" system that awards all the electors of one state to the candidate who wins in that particular state and . However, in the popular vote, Trump only received 62,984,825 votes against Hillary Clinton's 65,853,516 popular votes. Longley, Robert. In the 2020 general election, a ballot proposition attempted to overturn Colorado's membership to the pact, but the measure failed, 52.3% to 47.7% in the referendum. ashburnham school committee; its his baby now political cartoon meaning; softstar primal sawyer Today the Democrats want to replace the Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system with a direct popular vote and the Republicans adamantly want to keep it. 4. Advantages of the NPV Interstate Compact 1. In 6 Elections, 2 Near-Misses (2020, 2004) and 2 Second-Place Presidents (2016, 2000) National Popular Vote Has Been Enacted into Law in 16 Jurisdictions with 195 Electoral Votes. According to the University of Missouri-Kansas City Law School, some proponents of the Electoral College argue that it isolates election problems, such as illegally extended voting hours or irregularly high voter turnout. Under the electoral college, the majority votes of states assign electoral votes to a candidate, which then creates a majority total required for a victory. The popular vote eliminates this issue too. Although many supporters of the electoral college argue that a two-party political system is more stable, some critics counter that having more than two parties would give Americans more choice. That means the cost of counting all the votes would be duplicated. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement where states in the compact award all their electoral votes to the winner of the . The horror of a potential national recount is only one of the dangers direct presidential elections poses. NCSL conducts policy research in areas ranging from agriculture and budget and tax issues to education and health care to immigration and transportation. National Popular Vote (NPV) was founded in 2006 by lottery scratch-card inventor John Koza and election lawyer Barry Fadem to lobby for an "interstate compact" for states to deliver their electoral votes for President to the "winner" of the national popular vote. Although the 20th Amendment to the Constitution provides clarity to this situation, that process is based on the electoral college. Most recently, the bill was passed by a bipartisan 4016 vote in the Republican-controlled Arizona House, 2818 in Republican-controlled Oklahoma Senate, 574 in Republican-controlled New York Senate, and 3721 in Democratic-controlled Oregon House." List of the Cons of Using the Popular Vote 1. Part of HuffPost Politics. 1. cons of the national popular vote plan. "The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the entire U.S. ThoughtCo, Dec. 16, 2020, thoughtco.com/the-national-popular-vote-plan-3322047. You are also agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Is this a solution to first past the post or is it merely reinforcing our current two party system? If this happens many people in the red states will not feel that the change is legitimate even if its legal and technically constitutional. With a popular vote in place, each election win would be decreed a mandate to follow the platform of the winning party. 9 Pros and Cons of Electoral College | APECSEC.org Washington, DC 20005, Common Cause pays tribute to our leader, our friend, and a lifelong advocate for our democracy, Constitution, Courts & Other Democracy Issues, Ensure Fair Districts & Reflective Democracy, Expand Voting Rights & Election Integrity, Promote Free Speech & Accountability in Media, Protect the Constitution, Courts & Other Democracy Reforms. According to the Constitution, the Electoral College is a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens (National Archives). 6. In 2016, Hillary Clinton had more than 10 million of these votes, while Donald Trump had more than 8.3 million, even though Trump won 30 states and Clinton won 20 and the District of Columbia. Either would provide a reason for both parties to compete in most states because there would be electors to win. The cost of a presidential election in the United States is already several billion dollars. The itineraries of presidential candidates in battleground states (and their allocation of other campaign resources) demonstrate what every gubernatorial or senatorial candidate in every state already knows namely that when every vote matters, the campaign must be run in every part of the state. The NPVC is a proposed interstate compact in which the signatory states agree that they will appoint their presidential electors in accordance with the national popular vote rather than their own state electorate's vote. It has been enacted into law in 11 states with 165 electoral votes, and will take effect when enacted by states with 105 more. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the president. In theory that could happen every four years. Many Americans are confused about how a win is obtained under these conditions and are on a quest to change this traditional statute. After the 2016 presidential election, political science expert Nate Silver wrote that, since the swing states are not likely to support any plan that might reduce their influence over control of the White House, the National Popular Vote bill will not succeed unless the predominately Republican red states adopt it. Destroying the Electoral College: The Anti-Federalist National Popular That means every state is allowed a minimum of 3 electoral votes. However, a popular vote system, although hard to implement, is a more purely democratic system than the Electoral College. Cons of Electoral College. It is not at all clear that it would similarly prosper under the direct election regime being pushed by NPV. 4. The National Popular Vote stems from the winner-take-all approach that validates the presidential candidate interactions with only 4 out of 50 dates during their campaign. It knows that a majoritarianism that produces a plurality is not the voice of a majority of the citizenry. The framers enacted the provisions relating to the Electoral College to allow for state innovation. Common Cause That effectively means that votes in the the 75% of the country that are in swing states effectively dont count at all. Wyoming had just 3 electoral votes, but only had 255,000 voters as well. That's almost 1.5 billion . Poly Sci Final Flashcards | Quizlet The bill has crossed paths with 36 legislative chambers and has been sponsored or voted for by 3,112 state legislators (National Popular Vote). Instead of a direct popular election, the United States has the Electoral College, a group of electors who represent each state's votes. All states could adopt the system that now exists in Maine and Nebraska, where all but two electors are chosen by congressional district, and the other two go to the statewide winner. Electoral votes are designated among the states based on Census. On April 15, 2014 Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York State quietly signed into law the National Popular Vote, making New York the 10th state -- along with the District of Columbia -- to support this effort, while also boosting the total numbers to 165 of the 270 electoral votes needed to make a true national popular vote a reality. It seeks to be a bulwark against mass hysteria and the hysteria created by mass media. [Add switching votes of losing party to the other partys voter totals in every state using the Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system (except for 5 EC votes in Maine and Nebraska that are awarded proportionally instead of by Winner-Take-All.].

Pacific Catch West Coast Salmon Bowl Calories, What Happened To Jon Hammond Auction Kings, How To Get A Greater Rhino Conan Exiles, Clinic Room To Rent, What Happened To Destoni From Dr Phil, Articles C